The Need for AI Governance

How critical is it to develop AI governance?

Every aspect of our lives is being influenced by artificial intelligence systems.

AI became our best friend. We use it everywhere. Business progress, presentations, ways to engage with others and of course, in our personal life and the decisions that we take.

However, it is important to remember that when algorithms make or shape decisions that affect people, money, or reputations, accountability cannot be delegated to the model.

Without clear governance, organizations lose visibility into who trained the model, what data it uses, and why it behaves as it does. That’s a recipe for bias, legal exposure, and brand damage.

Many executives see governance as bureaucracy. However, in AI, it’s the opposite.
AI governance ensures reliability, consistency, and defensibility, which directly impact the bottom line.

Another huge difference is that in the AI era, governance is no longer about documents and presentations. It's about how we implement technology in real time.

Governance is at the core of implementation, as it evolves from words to embedded technology. Through enforced rules, AI systems empower what is allowed and useful.

The bottom line is that governance will turn AI from a risk into a structured repeatable business capability. And that is a trustworthy AI model.

How does AI governance affect organizations that do not build AI models?

Great question. Why should I be interested in AI governance if all I use is AI tools? Is it not just like any other SaaS? should that be part of my Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM)?

That’s where Shadow AI comes at risk. The Hidden AI Revolution must be understood.

Shadow AI refers to the use of AI tools, models, or services that did not go through organizational formal approval, oversight, or integration process.

Shadow AI typically emerges from positive intentions. Teams or individuals under pressure to deliver quickly turn to external AI tools to prototype, automate, or analyze data without lengthy approval cycles. Generative AI platforms and low-code environments enable anyone to build or deploy AI-driven solutions. When official AI strategies, tools, or governance lag behind user needs, employees naturally find their own paths to innovation.

While shadow AI can drive innovation, it also creates significant risks.

Uncontrolled, unsupervised and even unsupported AI use may expose data to unauthorized environments, create compliance gaps, and undermine enterprise security. Sensitive or proprietary data shared with public AI systems may be stored, reused, or exposed to external parties.

Additionally, unvetted AI tools generate accuracy, bias, and reputational risks. Other risks include model poisoning, intellectual property violations, and operational instability if AI-driven automations are poorly designed.

From a compliance perspective, unauthorized AI usage can lead to breaches of privacy regulations or data laws. These risks, if unchecked, can escalate into business, legal, and reputational damage.

To identify shadow AI, we need to combine procedural and technical methods.

Network and API traffic should be monitored for unapproved connections to AI platforms and analyzing cloud logs for AI use patterns.

Surveys and interviews can help uncover tools that employees use informally.

Procurement and expense reviews may reveal AI subscriptions embedded within other SaaS services.

In addition, examining workflow or content patterns can highlight AI-generated material that bypasses oversight.

Mitigating shadow AI requires a delicate balance between freedom to innovate and structured oversight.

A clear and flexible AI governance framework should define acceptable use, data handling requirements, and approved tool lists. Organizations should encourage transparency rather than punishment to ensure employees report AI usage voluntarily. Practical steps include creating an official AI Use Policy, deploying CASB and DLP solutions to detect and block unauthorized AI activity. Where applicable, establishing a secure environment for the AI playground.

Auditing and inventorying AI systems will allow the organization to maintain visibility.

Last but extremely important is that employees must be educated on responsible AI use, including data protection and accountability lessons.

Shadow AI is not a threat to be eradicated but a signal that innovation thrives faster than governance. Shadow AI can be used successfully by organizations when freedom, clear policies, and technical visibility are combined.

As an executive, don't restrict innovation.

Instead, provide guardrails to allow its growth.

Need assistance with installing AI governance?

Identifying shadow AI?

Contact us now